맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
  • Page 1 of 2  

Recommended Posts

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

I want a MacBook Air for University in September (UK), the M1 seems to outperform the M2 in SSD speed hugely, Logic Pro speed and many other fields, it is also more tried and tested compared to the M2 that may have some problems found down the line due to it being so new. The M2 has a prettier new design and better resolution and obviously has the M2 chip (still not too sure what it does.) ,the MagSafe charging and overall the M2 will probably be more future proof, right? The configuration I believe is best for me at the minute is the M1 with 16gb unified memory with 512 SSD, with Logic Pro X included this takes me to around £1,573, the M2 with same configuration and the 10 core takes me to around £1,923, now I don't mind paying more if the M2 will last longer and if the M2 really makes up for the M1 being faster. I can also configure the M2 to have 24gb unified memory (M1 only goes to 16gb) would this be worth it? What would be the best option for me as a music producer who uses Logic Pro X?

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

either one should suit you well, and both are similarly future-proofed. 16/512 is fine. down the line, you can always archive older projects on an external (if you need to).

the M2 has 2 viable ports (the M1 needs one of those for power), a bigger screen, better camera. at 512gb, the SSD will be fine (the 256gb SSD has the slower speed). it's really whether you need 2 ports, and, as much, prefer the aesthetic of the new one.

LP10.7.4 • os13b • 3.2GHz i7 imac • one plugin short of perfection  upstatebrooklyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Author

    • Share

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

Are all M1 compatible third party plugins are automatically M2 compatible?

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

5 minutes ago, stratquebec said:

Are all M1 compatible third party plugins are automatically M2 compatible?

they're both silicon chips, and technically, 'M1-ready' really means 'silicon-ready'... so, yes.

  • Quote

LP10.7.4 • os13b • 3.2GHz i7 imac • one plugin short of perfection  upstatebrooklyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

37 minutes ago, fisherking said:

they're both silicon chips, and technically, 'M1-ready' really means 'silicon-ready'... so, yes.

Maybe some exceptions exists. Just found this one:

Quote

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

'not supported' does not mean 'doesn't work'. NI is probably testing things out on the new M2 macs now, and wants to be 100% sure all is well.. which is a good practice.

if i'm wrong, i will eat my hat (important note: i do not have a hat)...

LP10.7.4 • os13b • 3.2GHz i7 imac • one plugin short of perfection  upstatebrooklyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

Eat your shorts?

2020 M1 Mini (16gb/1tb), macOS 11.6.8, Logic 10.6.3; RME FF802, Novation 61SL Mk II. Martins and Fenders and Guilds, oh my!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

23 minutes ago, fisherking said:

'not supported' does not mean 'doesn't work'. NI is probably testing things out on the new M2 macs now, and wants to be 100% sure all is well.. which is a good practice.

👍

About your hat, I can send you one of mine!

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

6 minutes ago, stratquebec said:

About your hat, I can send you one of mine!

ah, but... no need... since i'm not wrong... 🙃

LP10.7.4 • os13b • 3.2GHz i7 imac • one plugin short of perfection  upstatebrooklyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

What the ’king says. 
 

if you have the budget for the 512 GB SSD, the new one is the one to get. 

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

What is the reason why the 256 is slower than the 512? « On purpose » marketing limitation to sell more 512 or the bigger SSD the faster?

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

4 minutes ago, stratquebec said:

What is the reason why the 256 is slower than the 512? « On purpose » marketing limitation to sell more 512 or the bigger SSD the faster?

Couple musings:

Single 256GB chip vs. two of them on the 512 GB model — supply-chain-wise, it’s a lot easier to stock more of one kind and use it as needed than to stock multiple different sizes. 
 

Might also be that 256 GB chips are easier and cheaper to come by as chip manufacturers focus on streamlined production in the face of their own supply-chain issues. 
 

Also, the target market for the base model really won’t care much about the slower SSD. It’s slower by comparison, but still plenty fast. 

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

5 minutes ago, analogika said:

Also, the target market for the base model really won’t care much about the slower SSD. It’s slower by comparison, but still plenty fast. 

Interesting. Found this also.

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

From what Apple says, the M2 is 1.4x faster than the M1. 
I'd probably go with the M1, if they can still be had, new. I regret not getting one when they were around €1100 for the 512gb ssd. But, last year we bought 2 M1 minis and our first ever smartphones ( 2x iphone 12 mini), and we have 2 iPads.

I don't want to be seen as a fanboi….

Edited July 18 by Glenn Lancaster

  • Quote

2020 M1 Mini (16gb/1tb), macOS 11.6.8, Logic 10.6.3; RME FF802, Novation 61SL Mk II. Martins and Fenders and Guilds, oh my!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

13 minutes ago, stratquebec said:

Interesting. Found this also.

so, effectively 1.5 GByte/sec sustained read and write speeds, vs. 2 GByte/sec on the M1 ones? And it's not an issue on the 512 machines.

As far as I'm concerned, the two usable ports (plus MagSafe, vs. 1 usable port on the M1 model remaining after the power cable) and availability of a 24GB RAM option seal the deal.

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

1 hour ago, stratquebec said:

What is the reason why the 256 is slower than the 512? « On purpose » marketing limitation to sell more 512 or the bigger SSD the faster?

According to my readings, it’s not that the 256 SSD is slower than the 512, but the 512 model uses two NAND chips instead of of one for the 256 model. More on the NAND chip here.

So now the question is: why not put two  NAND chips in the 256 model? The chip slot is there but is empty, on the motherboard. 

Marketing strategy? I think yes but in any case, I use Logic not Final Cut and don’t do video editing so a ram/storage ratio of 16/256 or even 8/256 would be just fine given the use of a few third party plugins and libraries and an external drive to archive my projects.

Edited July 18 by stratquebec

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

Just now, stratquebec said:

According to my readings, it’s not that the 256 SSD is slower than the 512, but the 512 model uses two NAND chips instead of of one for the 256 model.

So now the question is: why not put two  NAND chips in the 256 model? The chip slot is there but is empty, on the motherboard. 

Marketing strategy? I think yes but in any case, I use Logic not Final Cut and don’t do video editing so a ram/storage ratio of 16/256 or even 8/256 would be just fine given the use of a few third party plugins an an external drive to archive my projects.

why would that be a 'marketing strategy'?? there are undoubtedly things going on behind the scenes about this. and most people will not notice the difference. but if i were getting an M2 for logic, i would definitely go 16/512 (or 1tb)... for all the logical reasons...

LP10.7.4 • os13b • 3.2GHz i7 imac • one plugin short of perfection  upstatebrooklyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

2 minutes ago, stratquebec said:

According to my readings, it’s not that the 256 SSD is slower than the 512, but the 512 model uses two NAND chips instead of of one for the 256 model.

So now the question is: why not put two  NAND chips in the 256 model? The chip slot is there but is empty, on the motherboard. 

Marketing strategy? I think yes but in any case, I use Logic not Final Cut and don’t do video editing so a ram/storage ratio of 16/256 or even 8/256 would be just fine given the use of a few third party plugins an an external drive to archive my projects.

Again: 

1 hour ago, analogika said:

Couple musings:

Single 256GB chip vs. two of them on the 512 GB model — supply-chain-wise, it’s a lot easier to stock more of one kind and use it as needed than to stock multiple different sizes. 
 

Might also be that 256 GB chips are easier and cheaper to come by as chip manufacturers focus on streamlined production in the face of their own supply-chain issues. 
 

Also, the target market for the base model really won’t care much about the slower SSD. It’s slower by comparison, but still plenty fast. 

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

If it were "marketing strategy", there would be mention in the marketing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

Maybe I'm wrong, so to be verified, but all MBA have just one NAND chip, the difference

6 hours ago, Hedge336633 said:

I can also configure the M2 to have 24gb unified memory (M1 only goes to 16gb) would this be worth it? What would be the best option for me as a music producer who uses Logic Pro X?

As we, audio creator users, don't realy care about video and GPU (we can't use this so far), RAM and storage are the key. Much of this you can buy the better it will be.

IMO.

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

15 minutes ago, FLH3 said:

Maybe I'm wrong, so to be verified, but all MBA have just one NAND chip, the difference

Quote

Apple sent The Verge to review — and read speeds that can be 40 to 50 percent slower. 

This is not an unexpected result since the base Air only includes a single NAND chip, while the M1 models and 512GB (and up) M2 models have two, which can allow for nearly twice as fast speeds.

Here

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

17 minutes ago, FLH3 said:

As we, audio creator users, don't realy care about video and GPU (we can't use this so far), RAM and storage are the key. Much of this you can buy the better it will be.

Agree.

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

25 minutes ago, analogika said:

Also, the target market for the base model really won’t care much about the slower SSD. It’s slower by comparison, but still plenty fast. 

Indeed.

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

25 minutes ago, analogika said:

If it were "marketing strategy", there would be mention in the marketing.

?

  • Quote

Logic Pro 10.6.3, MacOs Catalina 10.15.7, 2012 iMac 27" 3.4 GHz i7, 1TB HD W/ Fusion drive, 8 GB ram, MacBook Pro Early 2015 (Retina, 13-inch) Big Sur 11.6.8, Logic 10.7.4, Behringer X-Touch, Focusrite Saffire Le w/ thunderbolt adapter - > firewire 800/400 cable, Korg nanokontrol2, Korg MicroKey 27, Alesis VI61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

3 hours ago, fisherking said:

'not supported' does not mean 'doesn't work'. NI is probably testing things out on the new M2 macs now, and wants to be 100% sure all is well.. which is a good practice.

if i'm wrong, i will eat my hat (important note: i do not have a hat)...

You used to have a hat on your head in your thumbnail.

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

  • Quote

Jim
MacBook Air M1 16 GB RAM - latest Logic and macOS version - Focusrite 2i2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

7 hours ago, Hedge336633 said:

I want a MacBook Air for University in September (UK), the M1 seems to outperform the M2 in SSD speed hugely, Logic Pro speed and many other fields, it is also more tried and tested compared to the M2 that may have some problems found down the line due to it being so new. The M2 has a prettier new design and better resolution and obviously has the M2 chip (still not too sure what it does.) ,the MagSafe charging and overall the M2 will probably be more future proof, right? The configuration I believe is best for me at the minute is the M1 with 16gb unified memory with 512 SSD, with Logic Pro X included this takes me to around £1,573, the M2 with same configuration and the 10 core takes me to around £1,923, now I don't mind paying more if the M2 will last longer and if the M2 really makes up for the M1 being faster. I can also configure the M2 to have 24gb unified memory (M1 only goes to 16gb) would this be worth it? What would be the best option for me as a music producer who uses Logic Pro X?

I have the M1 Air and it is plenty powerful for Logic. 1 extra port on the M2 Air won’t help musicians anyway. (Usually)
Just use a dongle. It works wonderfully. 
On the plus side for the dongle: connect everything to it and when you sit down to record you only have to connect ONE thing. Done. 

And yes if you go for the 512 SSD in the M2 Air it will outperform the M1 Air in every way. 

  • Quote

Jim
MacBook Air M1 16 GB RAM - latest Logic and macOS version - Focusrite 2i2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

1 hour ago, stratquebec said:

?

"Marketing strategy" requires that the models you're selling be publicly differentiated.

Gimping one and not telling anybody just results in bad press. Which indicates that they didn't want it to be this way.

Which is why I concluded that it's probably to do with procuring enough chips at a a price that will actually let them manufacture enough of what has been their best-selling Mac for a decade now. 

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Author

    • Share

Link to comment
Share on other sites

맥북에어 M2 로직 - maegbug-eeo M2 lojig

    • Share

1 minute ago, Mania said:

I have the M1 Air and it is plenty powerful for Logic. 1 extra port on the M2 Air won’t help musicians anyway. (Usually)
Just use a dongle. It works wonderfully. 
On the plus side for the dongle: connect everything to it and when you sit down to record you only have to connect ONE thing. Done. 

And yes if you go for the 512 SSD in the M2 Air it will outperform the M1 Air in every way. 

The 256 GB M2 outperforms the M1 in every way that isn't directly dependent upon disk access speed. 

I'm currently still on my 2016 15" MBP, but I've a borrowed M1 Air here for testing, and I can say that only having one single port after plugging in power *kills* this machine for virtually any of the usage scenarios in my world, even given the Thunderbolt Dock I use in the studio. Having one port extra would make it barely tolerable. Obviously, your mileage may vary.

Given that the M2 can be bought with 24 GB RAM, buying an M2 with 24 GB and at least 512 GB is kind of a no-brainer, assuming funds are available.

  • Quote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
  • Page 1 of 2  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.